How the Venus flytrap snaps (2024)

  • Letter
  • Published:
  • Yoël Forterre1,
  • Jan M. Skotheim2,4,
  • Jacques Dumais3 &
  • L. Mahadevan3,4

Nature volume433,pages 421–425 (2005)Cite this article

  • 20k Accesses

  • 803 Citations

  • 105 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The rapid closure of the Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) leaf in about 100 ms is one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom. This led Darwin to describe the plant as “one of the most wonderful in the world”1. The trap closure is initiated by the mechanical stimulation of trigger hairs. Previous studies2,3,4,5,6,7 have focused on the biochemical response of the trigger hairs to stimuli and quantified the propagation of action potentials in the leaves. Here we complement these studies by considering the post-stimulation mechanical aspects of Venus flytrap closure. Using high-speed video imaging, non-invasive microscopy techniques and a simple theoretical model, we show that the fast closure of the trap results from a snap-buckling instability, the onset of which is controlled actively by the plant. Our study identifies an ingenious solution to scaling up movements in non-muscular engines and provides a general framework for understanding nastic motion in plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

How the Venus flytrap snaps (1)
How the Venus flytrap snaps (2)
How the Venus flytrap snaps (3)
How the Venus flytrap snaps (4)

Similar content being viewed by others

How the Venus flytrap snaps (6)

Calcium-mediated rapid movements defend against herbivorous insects in Mimosa pudica

Article Open access 14 November 2022

How the Venus flytrap snaps (7)

Real-time conversion of tissue-scale mechanical forces into an interdigitated growth pattern

Article 10 June 2021

References

  1. Darwin, C. Insectivorous Plants (Murray, London, 1875)

    Google Scholar

  2. Burdon-Sanderson, J. On the electromotive properties of the leaf of dionaea in the excited and unexcited states. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 173, 1–55 (1882)

    Article ADS Google Scholar

  3. Stuhlman, O. Jr & Darder, E. B. The action potentials obtained from Venus's-flytrap. Science 111, 491–492 (1950)

    Article ADS Google Scholar

  4. Hodick, D. & Sievers, A. The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174, 8–18 (1988)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  5. Hodick, D. & Sievers, A. On the mechanism of trap closure of Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). Planta 179, 32–42 (1989)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  6. Sibaoka, T. Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 20, 165–184 (1969)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  7. Juniper, B. E., Robins, R. J. & Joel, D. M. The Carnivorous Plants (Academic, London, 1989)

    Google Scholar

  8. Williams, S. E. & Bennet, A. B. Leaf closure in the Venus flytrap: an acid growth response. Science 218, 1120–1122 (1982)

    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

  9. Stuhlman, O. A physical analysis of the opening and closing movements of the lobes of Venus' flytrap. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 7, 22–44 (1948)

    Article Google Scholar

  10. Ashida, J. Studies on leaf movement of Aldrovanda vesiculosa . Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ., Ser. B 9, 141–244 (1934)

    Google Scholar

  11. Morillon, R., Liénard, D., Chrispeels, M. J. & Lassalles, J.-P. Rapid movements of plants organs require solute-water cotransporters or contractile proteins. Plant Physiol. 127, 720–723 (2001)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  12. Brown, W. H. The mechanism of movement and duration of the effect of stimulation in the leaves of dionaea. Am. J. Bot. 3, 68–90 (1916)

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Hill, B. S. & Findlay, G. P. The power of movement in plants: the role of osmotic machines. Q. Rev. Biophys. 14, 173–222 (1981)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Love, A. E. H. A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity 4th edn (Dover, New York, 1944)

    MATH Google Scholar

  15. Biot, M. A. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 12, 155–165 (1941)

    Article ADS Google Scholar

  16. Skotheim, J. M. & Mahadevan, L. Dynamics of poroelastic filaments. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 460, 1995–2020 (2004)

    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar

  17. Frensch, J. & Steudle, E. Axial and radial hydraulic resistance to roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. 91, 719–726 (1989)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  18. Dumais, J. & Kwiatkowska, D. Analysis of surface growth in shoot apices. Plant J. 31, 229–241 (2002)

    Article Google Scholar

  19. Green, P. B., Havelange, A. & Bernier, G. Floral morphogenesis in Anagallis: Scanning-electron-micrograph sequences from individual growing meristems before, during, and after the transition to flowering. Planta 185, 502–512 (1991)

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  20. Mansfield, E. H. The Bending and Stretching of Plates 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1989)

    Book Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Shindler for the illustrations in Fig. 2. We acknowledge support via the Norwegian Research Council (J.M.S.) and the Schlumberger Chair Fund (L.M.) at Cambridge University, where this work was begun and primarily done.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IUSTI CNRS, Université de Provence, 5 rue Enrico Fermi, 13453 Cedex 13, Marseille, France

    Yoël Forterre

  2. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of , Cambridge, CB3 0WA, Cambridge, UK

    Jan M. Skotheim

  3. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Biological Laboratories, 16 Divinity Avenue

    Jacques Dumais&L. Mahadevan

  4. Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Pierce Hall, 29 Oxford Street, Massachusetts, 02138, Cambridge, USA

    Jan M. Skotheim&L. Mahadevan

Authors

  1. Yoël Forterre

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Jan M. Skotheim

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Jacques Dumais

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. L. Mahadevan

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Mahadevan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video

Kinematic measurements of snapping were carried out on videos filmed at 400 frames s-1. Here we show a representative video of leaf closure filmed at the slightly lower speed of 125 frames s-1 and played back at 30 frames s-1. (MOV 5597 kb)

Supplementary Methods

This section includes (a) details of the strain-field measurement technique, (b) experiments and results regarding the response of the leaf tissue to impulsive and step loads, (c) details of our poroelastic model for the dynamics of leaf closure, and (d) a summary of our notation. (DOC 68 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

This figure presents typical measurements of the local strain field associated with leaf closure, determined using the replica technique. (PDF 2319 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

This figure shows the response of a strip of the closed leaf to impulse and step loads. The results are consistent with the simple estimate of the inertial and relaxation times in the main text of the paper. (PDF 408 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forterre, Y., Skotheim, J., Dumais, J. et al. How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature 433, 421–425 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03185

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Access through your institution

Change institution

Buy or subscribe

Editorial Summary

Plant movements: a touch of Venus

The Venus flytrap takes just 100 milliseconds to snap up its prey, one of the fastest movements in the plant kingdom. The biochemical response of the trigger hairs to stimuli and the way that an action potential propagates across the leaves are well known. Less well understood is the mechanism of post-stimulation closure of the trap. Using highspeed video, microscopy and force measurements, the rapid closure mechanism is now shown to result from a mechanical buckling instability. The geometry of the doubly-curved leaf provides a mechanism that can first store, then release elastic energy.

Advertisem*nt

How the Venus flytrap snaps (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Trent Wehner

Last Updated:

Views: 6134

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Trent Wehner

Birthday: 1993-03-14

Address: 872 Kevin Squares, New Codyville, AK 01785-0416

Phone: +18698800304764

Job: Senior Farming Developer

Hobby: Paintball, Calligraphy, Hunting, Flying disc, Lapidary, Rafting, Inline skating

Introduction: My name is Trent Wehner, I am a talented, brainy, zealous, light, funny, gleaming, attractive person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.